See how your pages are organized, how deep they sit in your site, where internal paths break, and which structural issues deserve attention first.
Roshlytix crawls your website and audits click depth, dead-end pages, headings, metadata, broken links, and sitemap gaps. You get a 0–100 website structure health score plus practical fixes tied to the pages where each issue was found.
Free during beta · No signup required · Analyze up to 200 pages
We'll crawl up to 200 pages of your site for free.
| Scan size | Up to 200 pages during beta |
|---|---|
| Checks | Click depth, dead ends, headings, metadata, broken links and sitemap gaps |
| Output | 0–100 structure health score, issue list and practical fixes |
| Best for | SEO audits, redesigns, migrations, growing content sites and routine structure checks |
A website structure analyzer is a crawler that examines how pages are organized and connected across a site. It helps reveal whether important URLs are easy to reach, whether navigation paths break, whether pages end without useful onward links, and whether basic page and sitemap signals are consistent.
Roshlytix turns those checks into a site-level audit rather than leaving you with a raw crawl export. The goal is to show what the structural issue is, which page is affected, why it is worth reviewing, and what practical change could resolve it.
A site structure audit is not a prediction of Google rankings. It is a way to make the website easier to navigate, crawl, maintain, and understand.
The audit focuses on structural problems that can accumulate as a website grows. Roshlytix currently checks the following areas:
Crawl depth is the number of internal-link steps between the crawl starting point and a page. A page linked directly from the homepage is shallower than one that can only be reached after several clicks.
The analyzer flags pages that sit unusually deep in the site so you can review whether important content has become harder to reach than it needs to be. There is no universal number of clicks that guarantees or prevents rankings; depth should be interpreted in the context of the page’s importance and the rest of the site.
A dead-end page gives visitors and crawlers little or no useful path to continue through the website. It may receive incoming links but fail to point users toward related content, parent sections, products, or the next logical step.
Dead ends are different from orphan pages. An orphan page lacks discovered incoming internal links; a dead-end page can be reachable but still provide poor onward navigation.
Headings help organize a page into understandable sections. The analyzer reviews heading-related issues so you can identify pages where the visible structure may be unclear or inconsistent.
A heading warning is not a reason to rewrite a page automatically. Review whether the headings accurately describe the content and whether the hierarchy makes the page easier for a person to scan.
Titles and meta descriptions help identify and summarize pages in search and browser contexts. Roshlytix surfaces metadata issues found during the scan so you can review pages with missing, weak, or inconsistent signals.
Metadata should describe the actual page and its search intent. Avoid creating unique text purely to satisfy a checker if the result becomes less accurate or less useful to a searcher.
Broken internal links send users and crawlers toward URLs that no longer return the expected page. They commonly appear after URL changes, deleted content, product removals, migrations, or manual editing errors.
The structure audit helps surface broken paths so you can update the link, restore the missing destination, or redirect an obsolete URL when there is a genuinely relevant replacement.
Your XML sitemap and your crawlable site structure should broadly describe the public pages you intend search engines to discover. Roshlytix compares what it can find during the audit with sitemap information and flags gaps worth reviewing.
A sitemap difference is not automatically an SEO problem. Some URLs may be intentionally excluded, blocked, redirected, canonicalized elsewhere, or outside the intended indexable set. Treat the result as a prompt for investigation.
The Website Structure Analyzer is designed to replace a vague “your site has issues” message with a prioritized view of the pages that need review.
A 0–100 website structure health score that summarizes the audit findings.
A list of structural issues tied to the pages where they were detected.
A plain-English explanation of why each issue is worth reviewing.
A practical fix or next action instead of an unexplained warning code.
A site-wide view across up to 200 pages during the current beta.
The score is a Roshlytix audit score, not a Google metric and not a guarantee of ranking performance. The issue list and the context behind each finding are more important than chasing a perfect number.
The example below is illustrative. Your report will depend on the pages and links Roshlytix can discover on your website.
| Finding | Example page | Why review it | Practical next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deep page | /guides/technical-seo | Important guide sits several link steps from the main site entry points. | Add a relevant link from a stronger hub, category, or related guide if it helps users reach the page. |
| Dead end | /resources/checklist | Visitors reach the page but have no clear next relevant path. | Add useful onward links to related resources, tools, or the parent topic. |
| Broken internal link | /blog/old-audit | A link points to a destination that no longer returns the expected content. | Update the source link or redirect the old destination when a relevant replacement exists. |
| Metadata issue | /services/seo | The page metadata needs review for clarity or completeness. | Rewrite the title or description so it accurately describes the page and its search intent. |
| Sitemap gap | /guides/site-migration | The crawl and sitemap do not agree about the URL. | Check whether the URL belongs in the sitemap and whether its canonical/indexing setup is intentional. |
Enter your website URL. Start with the domain or site you want to review.
Roshlytix discovers public URLs and crawls the pages it can access, up to the beta scan limit.
The crawl maps internal paths and inspects structural and page-level signals such as depth, links, headings, metadata and sitemap consistency.
The analyzer groups the findings into a 0–100 health score and an issue list with practical recommendations.
You review each recommendation in the context of the page’s real purpose before changing the site.
Website structure determines how people move from broad sections to specific pages and how easily crawlers can discover paths between URLs. A clear structure makes important destinations easier to reach and makes related content easier to understand as a connected set rather than isolated pages.
Structural problems often appear slowly. A new article is published without a useful hub link. A migration leaves old internal URLs behind. Navigation changes push an important page deeper into the site. A sitemap continues listing a page the site no longer links to. None of these issues requires a dramatic redesign, but together they can make the website harder to maintain and navigate.
A structure audit gives you a map of those problems so you can fix the pages that matter instead of changing the entire site blindly.
A website structure analyzer focuses on how pages are organized and connected. A full technical SEO audit usually covers a wider set of areas such as rendering, indexation directives, canonicals, redirects, performance, Core Web Vitals, structured data, international targeting, and other technical signals.
Roshlytix is useful when your question is specifically: “Is the way my site is organized creating avoidable problems?” It should not be treated as a replacement for every type of technical SEO testing.
| Question | Website Structure Analyzer | Full technical SEO audit |
|---|---|---|
| How deep are important pages? | Yes | Usually |
| Where are dead ends and broken internal paths? | Yes | Usually |
| Are headings and metadata structurally consistent? | Yes | Usually |
| Do the crawl and sitemap show gaps? | Yes | Usually |
| Are Core Web Vitals healthy? | No | Often |
| Are backlinks strong or toxic? | No | Sometimes / separate audit |
| Are international hreflang rules correct? | No | Often |
You will often see SEO advice claiming every important page must be within three clicks of the homepage. Treat that as a useful design heuristic, not a universal ranking rule.
A better question is whether important pages are easy to reach through logical navigation and relevant internal links. A large ecommerce catalog, documentation site, and ten-page local business website will naturally have different structures.
Use crawl depth to spot outliers: high-value pages that are much harder to reach than comparable pages, sections that require unnecessary navigation steps, or pages that became buried after the site changed.
When a link leads to a missing or incorrect destination, decide whether the source link should be updated, removed, or pointed to an appropriate replacement. If the old URL itself has moved permanently and has a clear successor, a redirect may be appropriate.
Do not add random homepage links to every deep URL. Link important pages from the sections, category pages, pillar pages, or related content where a user would reasonably expect to find them.
Add contextual links that help the visitor continue the task they started. A guide can point to a related tutorial, a product page can point to documentation, and a category page can guide visitors toward relevant subcategories or products.
Use headings to describe the content beneath them and metadata to accurately summarize the page. The goal is clarity, not passing a mechanical checklist.
If a useful canonical page should be discoverable through the sitemap but is missing, add it. If an obsolete, redirected, duplicate, or intentionally non-indexable URL remains in the sitemap, remove it when appropriate. Do not assume every crawl/sitemap mismatch requires the same fix.
SEO specialists who need a faster first-pass view of site architecture.
Content teams managing growing libraries of guides, landing pages, or documentation.
SaaS teams with product, feature, integration, help-center, and blog sections that can drift apart over time.
Ecommerce sites where category changes and discontinued products can leave broken paths or deep pages.
Agencies auditing client websites before recommending architecture or internal-link changes.
Website owners preparing for or checking the results of a redesign, CMS move, or URL migration.
Run an audit when the structure is likely to have changed, not simply because a calendar says so. Useful moments include:
after a redesign or navigation change;
before and after a site migration;
after publishing a large batch of new content or product pages;
after removing or consolidating sections;
when important pages are unexpectedly difficult to find through the site;
when broken links or sitemap inconsistencies start accumulating; or
as a periodic quality check on a website that changes frequently.
A structure audit gives you the broad architectural view. Internal-link opportunity analysis and orphan-page detection answer narrower questions.
Use the Website Structure Analyzer when you want to review the overall architecture, depth, dead ends, metadata, headings, broken paths, and sitemap consistency.
Use the Internal Link Finder when you want suggestions for which relevant pages should link to each other and where a contextual link could fit.
Use the Orphan Page Finder when your specific goal is to identify pages with no discovered incoming internal links and decide whether those pages should be connected, consolidated, redirected, or removed.
A crawler can only evaluate what it can access and discover during the scan. Roshlytix currently analyzes up to 200 pages per run during beta.
Sites that rely heavily on client-side JavaScript may not return enough server-rendered content for every check. Authentication, blocked crawling, unusual navigation, rate limits, inaccessible URLs, and pages outside the discovered URL set can also affect the result.
A sitemap is a discovery source, not proof that a URL is indexed or should be indexed. Likewise, a 0–100 structure score is not a Google ranking score. Use the report to prioritize investigation and then validate important changes with the website, analytics, Search Console, and other technical data where relevant.
A website structure analyzer crawls a site and reviews how pages are organized and connected. Roshlytix checks structural signals including click depth, dead-end pages, headings, metadata, broken links, and sitemap gaps, then summarizes the findings in a 0–100 health score with practical fixes.
The terms are often used for closely related tasks. Both focus on how pages are arranged, connected, and reached. “Website architecture” can also include higher-level planning such as navigation models, URL hierarchy, topic sections, and information architecture.
Structure affects how easily users and crawlers can reach pages, how internal links connect related content, and how clearly important sections are organized. A clean structure does not guarantee rankings, but structural problems can make otherwise useful pages harder to discover and navigate.
Crawl depth is the number of link steps required to reach a page from the crawler’s starting point. It is useful for identifying important pages that sit unusually deep in the internal-link structure.
There is no universal Google rule that every page must sit within a fixed number of clicks. In practice, important pages should be easy to reach through logical navigation and relevant internal links. Use depth to identify outliers rather than treating one number as a ranking threshold.
A dead-end page is a reachable page that provides little or no useful internal path onward. It differs from an orphan page, which has no discovered incoming internal links.
No. A sitemap can help search engines discover URLs, but it does not replace useful navigation and internal links. A page can appear in a sitemap and still be poorly connected to the rest of the website.
Yes. Roshlytix is free during the current beta and can analyze up to 200 pages per scan without requiring signup.
Roshlytix is not tied to one CMS. It can analyze public websites it is able to crawl. Sites that expose little server-rendered content or restrict automated access may return less complete results.
No. The analyzer reads publicly accessible pages and reports findings. It does not edit your content, navigation, metadata, sitemap, or links.
No. The Website Structure Analyzer focuses on site architecture and related structural checks. A full technical SEO audit may also evaluate rendering, canonicals, indexation directives, performance, Core Web Vitals, structured data, hreflang, and other technical areas.
It is a Roshlytix summary of the structural issues detected during the scan. It is not a Google metric or a prediction of where your pages will rank. Use the underlying findings and recommended fixes as the actionable part of the report.
You do not need to redesign an entire website because a crawler found a warning. You need to know which structural issues affect real pages, why they matter, and what the sensible next action is.
Run the Roshlytix Website Structure Analyzer to audit up to 200 pages, review your 0–100 structure health score, and work through practical fixes for the issues the crawl discovers.
Free during beta · No signup required · Up to 200 pages per scan
Find contextual link opportunities: Internal Link Finder
Investigate disconnected pages: Orphan Page Finder
Review page purpose and value: Content Intent Analyzer
These tools work even better together. Run them on the same site for a complete picture.